The reported US military action against Venezuela marks a dangerous escalation in an already volatile geopolitical landscape. Washington has justified its move citing security concerns and alleged threats, but the use of force against a sovereign nation once again raises uncomfortable questions about unilateralism and respect for international law. For Venezuela, already reeling under economic collapse, sanctions, and political instability, the attack deepens humanitarian distress and risks pushing the region into further turmoil.Global reactions have been sharply divided. Several Latin American nations, along with Russia and China, have strongly condemned the US action, calling it a violation of sovereignty and the UN Charter. Left-leaning governments and political blocs have warned that such interventions undermine diplomacy and set a dangerous precedent. On the other hand, a few US allies have offered guarded support or remained cautious, urging restraint while stopping short of outright endorsement. The United Nations and international rights bodies have called for de-escalation, dialogue, and protection of civilians.
At a time when the world is already grappling with multiple conflicts, the US-Venezuela episode highlights the growing fragility of the global order. Power politics, rather than multilateral consensus, appears to be driving decisions with far-reaching consequences. If diplomacy is sidelined in favour of force, smaller nations will continue to pay the price. The international community must move beyond statements of concern and actively push for dialogue, accountability, and adherence to international norms to prevent another crisis from spiralling out of control.
