New Delhi: One of the four death row convicts in the 2012 Nirbhaya gang rape and murder case, Vinay Sharma, today approached the Delhi High Court claiming that there were procedural lapses and “constitutional irregularities” in the rejection of his mercy plea by President Ram Nath Kovind.
The petition on Sharma’s behalf was moved by his lawyer A P Singh who said the matter has been filed in the high court registry. The plea claims that the recommendation sent to the President to reject the mercy plea did not contain the signature of Delhi Home Minister Satyendar Jain. Vinay’s mercy plea was rejected by the President on 1 February.
According to the petition, when the issue was raised before the Supreme Court, the Centre had contended that Jain’s signature was obtained on Whatsapp. It further claims that when the mercy plea was moved the model code of conduct (MCC) was in force and Jain was only a MLA candidate at that point of time as polls had been announced and therefore, he could not have exercised the power of Home Minister.
“To reject the mercy petition, the powers used are illegal, unconstitutional, a miscarriage of justice and also miscarriage of constitutional values of Election Commission of India,” the petition has alleged. The plea seeks an “order of direction in the nature of a certiorari in connection with the Constitutional irregularities that occurred during the MCC in National Capital Territory of Delhi by the respondents/concerned responsible persons. Please take appropriate legal cognisance on the petitioner’s petition as soon as possible, because the motto of our Constitution is access to justice for all”.