Chennai: A team of researchers have reported in the journal Nature that they have built an atomic clock that measures not a cloud of randomly oscillating atoms, as state-of-the-art designs measure now, but instead atoms that have been quantumly entangled.
The atoms are correlated in a way that is impossible according to the laws of classical physics, and that allows the scientists to measure the atoms’ vibrations more accurately.
Atomic clocks are the most accurate timekeepers in the world. These exquisite instruments use lasers to measure the vibrations of atoms, which oscillate at a constant frequency, like many microscopic pendulums swinging in sync.
Atomic clocks combine a quartz crystal oscillator with an ensemble of atoms to achieve greater stability. NASA’s Deep Space Atomic Clock will be off by less than a nanosecond after four days and less than a microsecond (one-millionth of a second) after 10 years. This is equivalent to being off by only one second every 10 million years.
The best atomic clocks in the world keep time with such precision that, if they had been running since the beginning of the universe, they would only be off by about half-second today.
Still, they could be even more precise. If atomic clocks could more accurately measure atomic vibrations, they would be sensitive enough to detect phenomena such as dark matter and gravitational waves. With better atomic clocks, scientists could also start to answer some mind-bending questions, such as what effect gravity might have on the passage of time and whether time itself changes as the universe ages.
Now, a new kind of atomic clock designed by MIT physicists may enable scientists to explore such questions and possibly reveal new physics.
The new setup can achieve the same precision four times faster than clocks without entanglement.
āEntanglement-enhanced optical atomic clocks will have the potential to reach a better precision in one second than current state-of-the-art optical clocksā, said lead author Edwin Pedrozo-PeƱafiel, a postdoc in MIT’s Research Laboratory of Electronics.
If state-of-the-art atomic clocks were adapted to measure entangled atoms the way the MIT team’s setup does, their timing would improve such that, over the entire age of the universe, the clocks would be less than 100 milliseconds off.
“When you increase the number of atoms, the average given by all these atoms goes toward something that gives the correct value,” said author Simone Colombo.
This is why today’s atomic clocks are designed to measure a gas composed of thousands of the same type of atom, in order to get an estimate of their average oscillations. A typical atomic clock does this by first using a system of lasers to corral a gas of ultracooled atoms into a trap formed by a laser. A second, very stable laser, with a frequency close to that of the atoms’ vibrations, is sent to probe the atomic oscillation and thereby keep track of time.
And yet, the Standard Quantum Limit is still at work, meaning there is still some uncertainty, even among thousands of atoms, regarding their exact individual frequencies. This is where Vuletic and his group have shown that quantum entanglement may help. In general, quantum entanglement describes a nonclassical physical state, in which atoms in a group show correlated measurement results, even though each individual atom behaves like the random toss of a coin.
The team reasoned that if atoms are entangled, their individual oscillations would tighten up around a common frequency, with less deviation than if they were not entangled. The average oscillations that an atomic clock would measure, therefore, would have a precision beyond the Standard Quantum Limit.
Co-author Vladan Vuletic says if today’s state-of-the-art atomic clocks can be adapted to measure quantumly entangled atoms, they would not only keep better time, but they could help decipher signals in the universe such as dark matter and gravitational waves, and start to answer some age-old questions.
“As the universe ages, does the speed of light change? Does the charge of the electron change?,” Vuletic says, adding, “That’s what you can probe with more precise atomic clocks.”