SC questions Centre’s reluctance to consider jab instead of hanging

The Supreme Court on Wednesday questioned the Central government’s reluctance to consider lethal injection as an alternative to hanging for executing death sentences, observing that it “is not willing to change” despite changing times.
A bench of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta made the observation while hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by advocate Rishi Malhotra, seeking to replace hanging with alternative methods such as lethal injection, electrocution, shooting, or gas chamber — procedures in which a convict could die within minutes. The plea argued that the present method of execution of the death sentence in India — by hanging by the neck till the prisoner is dead — is “painful, inhuman, and cruel”. “The problem is that the government is not willing to change. This is a very old process — times have changed,” the Justice Vikram Nath-led Bench orally remarked, responding to the Centre’s affidavit, which stated that offering convicts a choice between hanging and lethal injection may not be “feasible”.
In its affidavit, the Union government stated that the issue involves a policy decision and maintained that it was not inclined to alter the current system of execution.