Chandru committee report receives mixed reactions


A recent report by a one-man committee, led by retired Madras High Court judge Justice K Chandru, has ignited a heated debate in Tamil Nadu. The committee was formed by the state government to address caste-based discrimination and violence within educational institutions, following a disturbing incident involving two Scheduled Caste students.

The committee’s recommendations include prohibiting students from wearing caste-related coloured wristbands, rings, or forehead marks (tilaka) in schools. These markers, according to the report, amplify caste divisions and foster discriminatory behavior among students. It also suggests restricting bicycles with caste-related symbols and implementing alphabetical seating arrangements in classrooms to discourage caste-based grouping. Moreover, the committee advises removing caste-related information from attendance registers and discourages teachers from referring to students’ castes, aiming to promote a more inclusive and respectful educational environment.

However, these recommendations have not been universally welcomed. Senior leaders from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), including H Raja and K Annamalai, have strongly opposed the report, claiming it is biased against Hindus. They argue that banning symbols like the tilaka, which has religious significance for many Hindus, unfairly imposes on cultural practices. Annamalai, in particular, expressed concerns that such measures could inadvertently reinforce caste hierarchies instead of mitigating them.

“The government should reject this report entirely as it leans towards evangelical groups and includes impractical recommendations,” stated Annamalai, emphasising the need for a balanced approach that considers the views of all societal sections.

H Raja echoed these sentiments, asserting, “The report by Chandru is controversial as it targets Hindus. How could the report object to tilak? The State government should reject the report in its entirety.”

In defense of the committee’s recommendations, supporters argue that decisive action is necessary to curb caste-based discrimination, which persists in educational institutions despite existing legal protections. They stress the importance of creating an environment where all students feel safe and valued, regardless of their caste or background.

As the Tamil Nadu government deliberates on the committee’s recommendations, it faces the challenging task of balancing cultural sensitivity with the imperatives of social justice, as noted by political observer Kannan.