Close Menu
  • HOME
  • TAMIL NADU
  • CHENNAI
  • NATION
  • WORLD
  • BUSINESS
  • SPORTS
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • EDIT
  • COLUMNS
    • POINTBLANK
    • WHY TN IS FORBIDDEN LAND
  • MIXED BAG
    • CLIMATE & WEATHER
    • EDUCATION
    • HEALTH
    • JOBS
    • LEGAL
    • LIFESTYLE
    • SCIENCE
    • TECHNOLOGY
  • E-PAPER
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Threads YouTube
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Sunday, August 9, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
News Today | First with the newsNews Today | First with the news
Login / Register Subscribe
  • HOME
  • TAMIL NADU
  • CHENNAI
  • NATION
  • WORLD
  • BUSINESS
  • SPORTS
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • EDIT
  • COLUMNS
    • POINTBLANK
    • WHY TN IS FORBIDDEN LAND
  • MIXED BAG
    • CLIMATE & WEATHER
    • EDUCATION
    • HEALTH
    • JOBS
    • LEGAL
    • LIFESTYLE
    • SCIENCE
    • TECHNOLOGY
News Today | First with the newsNews Today | First with the news
  • E-PAPER
  • POINTBLANK
  • PRIME PULSE
  • TN ECHOES
  • FIFA 2026
  • DEEP DIVE
  • GLOCAL
  • COLD FACTS
  • LEADING LIGHTS
  • CRYSTAL GAZING
  • PATTERNS
Home » Madras HC dismisses applications against release of Viswaroopam II

Madras HC dismisses applications against release of Viswaroopam II

PTIBy PTIAugust 10, 2018No Comments
🌐 Translate â–Ÿ
  • Tamil
  • Hindi
  • Malayalam
  • Kannada
  • Telugu
Share WhatsApp Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Copy Link Email

Chennai: The Madras High Court yesterday dismissed applications filed by a film production firm seeking to stall the release of actor Kamal Hassan’s “Viswaroopam II”, set to hit the screens tomorrow, over a financial dispute.

Justice M Sundar dismissed the applications by Pyramid Saimira Productions International for recovery of Rs 5.44 crore which the company claimed it had paid as advance to Hassan and his production house Raj Kamal Films International for making a film over 10 years ago.

Pyramid Saimira had originally filed civil suits for recovery of the Rs 5.44 crore, contending that Hassan had not discharged his obligations as per an agreement it had signed with him for producing the film titled “Marmayogi” in Tamil and Hindi.

The actor had also filed a suit against Pyramid Saimira Productions claiming damages of Rs 11 crore for alleged breach of conditions of the agreement, saying the firm had not honoured committed payments.

In the meanwhile, Pyramid Saimira Productions filed two applications seeking to stall the release of “Viswaroopam II”, citing the pendency of the suit. In his counter, Hassan termed as false Pyramid Saimira’s claim that he had not commenced the work on ‘Marmayogi’.

He further submitted that the company through its director K S Srinivasan had agreed to pay Rs 1 crore as remuneration for directing the movie and Rs 15 crore for acting with an initial payment of Rs 3 crore.

Though it paid Rs 4.5 crore to him and Raj Kamal Films as advance, Pyramid Saimira Productions did not keep its promise to pay further amounts as per the agreement for the pre-production expenses. Giving break-up of pre-production expenses totalling over Rs two crore incurred by him, he said the Pyramid Saimira Productions did not make the payment.

Also, Hassan denied the Pyramid Saimira Productions’s claim that he had made an assurance to book Bollywood actors like Amitabh Bachan, Hema Malini, Bipasha Basu and Priyanka Chopra.

The “deliberate omission and failure” to pay the amount caused a lot of hardship to him personally as well as to Raj Kamal Films in producing the movie, he said, adding that hence, he also filed a civil suit claiming damages against Pyramid Saimira Productions.

Pointing to the suits filed by both the actor and the Pyramid Saimira Productions, Justice Sundar said,”It is not clear as to why the parties have not sought for joint or simultaneous trial of the suits.”

He said a person seeking relief under relevant rule of the Civil Procedure Code should be able to establish that there were actions which intended to defeat the rights of the applicant and also a possible decree in future

“There is no categorical and specific allegation in this regard,” he said, adding that the bank guarantee furnished already in favour of Pyramid Saimira Productions over the suit was being renewed from time to time.

Noting that it was not the desirable to approach the court at the eleventh hour in cases of this nature, the judge said the parties would do well to seek a joint trial in all the suits in a manner known to law.

Share. WhatsApp Facebook Twitter Telegram Copy Link Email
Previous ArticleTVS group chairman moves HC for anticipatory bail in idol theft case
Next Article SC orders closure of 27 resorts in elephant corridors in TN
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
guest
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Latest Posts

E-paper 08 August 2026

NT BureauAugust 8, 20260

Man lured, assaulted, extorted â‚č5 lakh;  

NT BureauAugust 8, 20260

Five persons, including a woman lawyer, were arrested by the Choolaimedu police for allegedly luring a man to a house, assaulting him, and attempting to extort â‚č5 lakh by threatening to expose a purported relationship.

‘Withdraw FCRA Bill’: Stalin urges Centre

NT BureauAugust 8, 20260

Retierating the DMK’s opposition to the provisions in the proposed FCRA Amendment Bill 2026, Party President and former Chief Minister M.K.Stalin on Saturday urged the Centre to consider Joint Action Forum (JAF) on Minorities,’ plea to withdraw the Bill and repeal Section 15 innit or refer it to the Joint Parliamentary Committee.

Delimitation move threatens federal balance, Says TNCC chief

NT BureauAugust 8, 20260

Congress MP Manickam Tagore has alleged that the Union government’s move to reintroduce the delimitation Bill in the მიმდინარე Parliament session would undermine India’s sovereignty and federal structure, and weaken democratic representation, particularly in southern States like Tamil Nadu.

Cheque bounce case: Court issues summons to Sarathkumar 

NT BureauAugust 8, 20260

A Saidapet court has ordered issuance of summons to actor and BJP functionary R. Sarathkumar, directing him to appear in person on September 10 in connection with a cheque bounce case.

About
About
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram RSS
Latest Posts
  • E-paper 08 August 2026
  • Man lured, assaulted, extorted â‚č5 lakh;  
  • ‘Withdraw FCRA Bill’: Stalin urges Centre
  • Delimitation move threatens federal balance, Says TNCC chief
  • Cheque bounce case: Court issues summons to Sarathkumar 
© 2026 NewsTodayNet.com. All Rights Reserved. Designed & Maintained by Gifted Technologies.
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

wpDiscuz
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Prove your humanity: 7   +   10   =  
Lost password?