Kathmandu, May 11:
Nepal’s government and judiciary are locked in a dispute after the Constitutional Council recommended Supreme Court Justice Manoj Sharma for appointment as Chief Justice, despite him ranking fourth in seniority.
The recommendation was made on May 7 by a council headed by Prime Minister Balendra Shah, breaking Nepal’s long-standing tradition of appointing the senior-most Supreme Court judge to the post.
Acting Chief Justice Sapana Pradhan Malla strongly criticised the decision, warning that it reflects an attempt by the executive to influence and control the judiciary. Speaking on National Law Day, she stressed that judges must remain independent and not be pressured by political power or threats such as impeachment.
The government defended its choice, arguing that Sharma had delivered more verdicts than his seniors and demonstrated greater capability. However, critics rejected this reasoning, saying judicial quality and precedent are more important than quantity.
Former Chief Justice Sushila Karki also criticised the move, calling it a setback for judicial independence and women’s representation in top judicial leadership. Legal experts warned it could weaken the tradition of seniority-based appointments.