The call for a 24×7 judiciary reflects an urgent recognition that justice delayed is often justice denied. As Chief Justice of India Surya Kant emphasises digital integration, the vision is ambitious and necessary. Courts that function beyond conventional hours, supported by technology, can significantly reduce pendency and improve accessibility. However, the promise of a round-the-clock justice system must be matched by administrative readiness, infrastructure, and human resource support to avoid becoming merely aspirational.
Yet, the deeper challenge lies not in launching digital platforms but in ensuring their usability and reach. India’s vast rural population, often unfamiliar with technology, risks being left behind in this transition. The emphasis on simple software interfaces and trained paralegal volunteers is therefore crucial. Without bridging this digital divide, reforms meant to democratise justice may inadvertently widen inequalities. Trust in the judiciary depends not only on efficiency but also on inclusivity.
The Madhya Pradesh model offers a promising template, but its success will depend on sustained collaboration between the judiciary and the government. The cautious exploration of Artificial Intelligence to expedite case disposal is another step forward, though it must be implemented with transparency and accountability. Ultimately, technological reform in the justice system must remain people-centric — ensuring that innovation strengthens, rather than distances, the common citizen’s faith in justice.