In a crucial legal development, Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi has submitted a written argument to the Supreme Court, asserting that he has the constitutional authority to exercise a “pocket veto” over bills passed by the state legislature.The Governor’s claim is based on his interpretation of Article 200 of the Constitution, which outlines the discretionary powers of the Governor in granting or withholding assent to bills. According to his submission, this discretion is not merely ceremonial but allows him to make an informed decision on whether a bill should be approved or not.
Governor Ravi argued that this power is essential to maintain constitutional balance and ensure that the executive and legislature function harmoniously. His submission comes in response to the state government’s petition, which challenges the Governor’s delay in approving multiple bills passed by the Tamil Nadu Assembly.
Furthermore, he contended that if a bill is withheld based on previous Supreme Court rulings, it effectively lapses, reinforcing his stance on the veto power. The Supreme Court’s decision on this matter is expected to have significant implications for the Governor-State relations and legislative process across the country.